Difference: RefactoringReadingGroup (1 vs. 18)

Revision 182008-08-13 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 55 to 55
 
Added:
>
>
 

Revision 172008-07-22 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 12 to 12
 

Future readings to discuss

Changed:
<
<
>
>
  • July 29: Break
 

Previously discussed readings

Added:
>
>
 

Revision 162008-07-16 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 50 to 50
 
Added:
>
>
 
Line: 60 to 61
 
Added:
>
>
 

Revision 152008-07-15 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 12 to 12
 

Future readings to discuss

Changed:
<
<
>
>
 

Previously discussed readings

Added:
>
>
 
Line: 47 to 49
 
Added:
>
>
 

Revision 142008-07-08 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 12 to 12
 

Future readings to discuss

Changed:
<
<
  • July 15
>
>
 

Previously discussed readings

Line: 40 to 41
 

Other interesting readings

  • Similar work by authors of previously discussed papers/papers to discuss:
Added:
>
>
 
Line: 49 to 51
 
Deleted:
<
<
 

Revision 132008-07-08 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 12 to 12
 

Future readings to discuss

Changed:
<
<
>
>
 

Previously discussed readings

Added:
>
>
 
Line: 47 to 49
 
Added:
>
>
 
Line: 57 to 60
 
Added:
>
>
 

Revision 122008-07-02 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 12 to 12
 

Future readings to discuss

Changed:
<
<
>
>
 

Previously discussed readings

Added:
>
>
 
Line: 43 to 45
 
Added:
>
>
 
Deleted:
<
<
 

Revision 112008-06-24 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 12 to 12
 

Future readings to discuss

Changed:
<
<
  • July 2?
>
>
 
Deleted:
<
<
 

Previously discussed readings

Added:
>
>
 
Line: 34 to 35
 

Other interesting readings

Changed:
<
<
  • Similar work by authors of previously discussed papers:
>
>
 

Revision 102008-06-18 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 34 to 34
 

Other interesting readings

Added:
>
>
  • Similar work by authors of previously discussed papers:
 
Deleted:
<
<
 
Deleted:
<
<
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
Added:
>
>
 
Added:
>
>
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
Deleted:
<
<
 

Revision 92008-06-18 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 35 to 35
 

Other interesting readings

Added:
>
>
 

Revision 82008-06-18 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 16 to 16
 
Changed:
<
<
    • Laddad, R. Aspect-Oriented Refactoring, part 1 and part 2. The Server Side (www.theserverside.com), 2003.
>
>
    • Laddad, R. Aspect-Oriented Refactoring, part 1 and part 2. The Server Side (www.theserverside.com), 2003.
 

Previously discussed readings

Revision 72008-06-18 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 12 to 12
 

Future readings to discuss

Changed:
<
<
>
>
 

Previously discussed readings

Added:
>
>
 
Line: 29 to 34
 

Other interesting readings

Added:
>
>
 
Deleted:
<
<
  • Laddad, R. Aspect-Oriented Refactoring, parts 1 and 2. The Server Side, 2003. www.theserverside.com/
 
Deleted:
<
<
 

Revision 62008-06-10 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Template for evaluating papers

Added:
>
>
  • Email these to discussion leader beforehand:
 
  • Summary of paper
  • Positive and negative points about the paper
  • Try to construct arguments both for why you would strongly support the paper (A rating) and why you would strongly oppose it (D rating)
Changed:
<
<

Previously discussed readings

>
>

Future readings to discuss

 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
Changed:
<
<

Future readings to discuss

>
>

Previously discussed readings

 
Changed:
<
<
  • June 10
>
>
  • June 10 (Rick leading)
 
Added:
>
>
 

Other interesting readings

Added:
>
>
 
Deleted:
<
<
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 

Revision 52008-06-09 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 27 to 27
 
Added:
>
>
 

Revision 42008-06-05 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 14 to 14
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 

Future readings to discuss

Line: 26 to 26
 

Other interesting readings

Added:
>
>
 

Revision 32008-06-05 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 26 to 26
 

Other interesting readings

Changed:
<
<
>
>
 

Revision 22008-06-05 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
 

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Line: 26 to 26
 

Other interesting readings

Added:
>
>
 

Revision 12008-06-04 - AlexBradley

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>

Refactoring Reading Group

KrisDeVolder, AlexBradley, RickChern, LloydMarkle

Template for evaluating papers

  • Summary of paper
  • Positive and negative points about the paper
  • Try to construct arguments both for why you would strongly support the paper (A rating) and why you would strongly oppose it (D rating)

Previously discussed readings

Future readings to discuss

Other interesting readings

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback