Difference: NsercDiscovery (4 vs. 5)
Revision 52011-06-24 - AllaSheffer
| Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSERC Discovery Grants | ||||||||
| Line: 62 to 62 | ||||||||
| Q3: Absolutely you need a mix of (a)-(c). I think (d) is subsumed by (c), although perhaps the small institution angle is something to consider (on the assumption these people might be more likely to accept a request to review). I have never even thought of (d) before, but I always look for a mix of (a)-(c). Specifically, you should have one from the U.S., one not from the U.S., and one from Canada who you think knows your work and is familiar with the NSERC system. (NOTE: Just being a long-time Canadian researcher with lots of NSERC funding does not mean one "knows" the system. Some "stars" are clueless about the politics of NSERC because they are above it by virtue of being a star.) The other two slots (assuming a total of five requests -- some grants allow seven or more) will probably depend on your circumstances. I tend to list at least two Canadians, both because they are more likely to understand the NSERC system, but also because they are more likely to accept a request to review. -- KelloggBooth - 24 Jun 2011 | ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | Request: For those who had applied in 2010 or 2011 - anyone minds posting not only the application but also the review/NSERC responses? This can perhpas give a sense of what NSERC looks for... -- AllaSheffer - 24 Jun 2011 | |||||||
View topic | History: r27 < r26 < r25 < r24 | More topic actions...
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback