> > |
Has anybody ever done the one-year deferral/extension in order to
spend down their balance? I've got a big unspent hunk of money in my
DG account (77K unspent, with annual grant of 25K). It has accumulated
because I've needed to spend down other accounts, and I do indeed plan
to make a big dent in it over the next year. They say "postponing an
application does not adversely affect the review of your next
application, but rather demonstrates good fiscal management of the
funds". They also say they can impose a deferral (don't get next
installment until later) or even a holdback (don't get next
installment at all) upon you at their discretion. All this is
documented at in the
[[http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/Professors-Professeurs/FinancialAdminGuide-GuideAdminFinancier/AdminMatters-QuestionAdmin_eng.asp#residual][Residual
Balances]] part of their admin guide, and this unspent balance issue
is specifically discussed in the 'How to succeed' document above.
Of course, the down side of deferring is in some sense I lose a year's
worth of money.
Scarily enough, I've heard informally that they could even do a
clawback (take money you already have in your account back), and the
rough number I heard was if you're over 2x the annual amount. I may
well still be over that mark by the time they deliberate in this
year's competition. And that would be a loss of two years of existing
money, so that's even worse. Plus, it might be hard to convince them
to give me lots of new money. So I'm leaning towards deferral. But my
big question is whether I'm being too paranoid or appropriately
prudent.
Questions: a) is clawback a real possibility? b) has anybody else
faced this problem before? if so what did you do?
-- TamaraMunzner - 18 July 2012 |