System Arquitecture Directions for Network Sensors |
Summary
"Technological Progress in integrated, low-power, CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) communication devices and sensors makes a rich design space of networked sensors viable. They can be deeply embedded in the physical world and spread throughout our environment like smart dust. The missing elements are an overall system architecture and a methodology for systematic advance. To this end, they identify key requirements, develop a small device that is representative of the class, design a tiny event-driven operating system, and show that it provides support for efficient modularity and concurrency-intensive operation. Their Operating System fits in 178 bytes of memory, propagates events in the time it takes to copy 1.25 bytes o memory, context switches in the time it takes to copy 6 bytes of memory and supports two level scheduling. The analysis lays a ground for future architectural advances". [3] |
Discussion
•Is it possible to make an estimate of
the battery life? •Are RFIDs Network Sensors? •How will sensors be in the future? •Can Sensor Networks become a privacy issue?
|
References
•Loren P. Clare, Esther H. Jennings, Jay L. Gao, “Performance Evaluation Modeling of Networked Sensors”, Ca, USA •Adrian Perrig, Robert Szewczk, Victor Wen, David Culler, “Security Protocols for Sensor Networks” University of California •Jason Hill, Rober Szewcsyk, Alec Woo, Seth Hollar, David Culler Kristofer Pister, "System Architecture Directions for Network Sensors" Berkeley, CA •http://www.aimglobal.org/technologies/rfid/ |
Slides |