The following policy was agreed to for allocating the quads for the future. * When a desk comes open, it is allocated by seniority, as determined by the number of months since joining the SPL. * In the case of a tie, the winner is determined by a coin toss. * Faculty members can override this policy for short-term uses (e.g. lab visitors). ---++ FAQ *Shouldn't !PhD students have precedence? They're here for longer.* As other students graduate, <nop>PhD students will eventually percolate upwards by attrition. During the first year, they're likely taking classes and so it shouldn't matter as much anyways. *Shouldn't we differentiate by whether the new occupants are doing research?* The use of seniority essentially provides this. *How long is a `short-term use'?* Left deliberately vague for flexibility. Generally an office can be found for longer-term visitors. And extremely short-term visitors generally won't need much space anyways. *When shouldn't I take a spot?* It's expected that people will use some common sense in following this policy: if you're unlikely to be here for much longer, save yourself the hassle of packing and moving and give up your place.
This topic: SPL
>
WebHome
>
DeskAllocationPolicy
Topic revision: r2 - 2005-12-08 - JohnAnvik
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback