*Page 12* * "as we say in Figure 1.4 ... " => The caption of Fig 1.4 doesn't say this, but the statement can be infered from the bottom right figure. Maybe "as we show" is better? *Page 13* * Caption of Fig 1.5: add "/N" to the formula for E_{RMS} * close to the end: "In Figure 1.6. We see that" => "In Figure 1.6, we see that" *Page 14* * caption of Fig 1.6: "least squares" was not used before (unless I missed it). I think a short explanation what is meant by it would be good. *Page 15* * Fig 1.7 left: "ln \lambda = -18" => "ln \lambda = -20" * Table 1.2: "ln \lambda = -18" => "ln \lambda = -20" *Page 16* * middle: "pattern recognition" was not used before (unless I missed it). I think a short explanation what is meant by it would be good. * close to end: "information ambiguous" => "information is ambiguous" *Page 19* * close to end: "In the top left is a histogram" => "In the top right is a histogram" *Page 23* * "several continuous variables x_1, ... x_d" => "several continuous variables x_1, ... x_D" *Page 25* * middle: "the chosen box was the blue one" => "the chosen box was the red one" (blue is not bad, but the discussion was about the red box) *Page 26* * middle: "consider a the distribution" => remove "a" or "the" *Page 27* * middle: after "common sense is violated", there's a question mark * middle: "context of of polynomial" => "context of polynomial" * in Laplace box: "he was also made" => "he has also made" (I think it would be nicer to swap Bayes box and Laplace box, because we first here about Bayes in the text, and Laplace is somehow hidden). *Page 29* * middle: "X = (x_1 ..." => X should be in bold and not italic, for vector * middle: "n=1,...N" => I think it shouldn't be there at all, we don't use n before 1.46, where it's clear what it is * middle: "from a Gaussian distribution" => I think it would be more clear: "from a univariate Gaussian distribution", because we just talked about multi-variate. *Page 32* * just before 1.2.5: "likelihood liesat the root" => "likelihood lies at the root" * bottom: it's a bit confusing that the presicion, which was denoted by lambda on page 28, is now denoted by beta. Maybe one of them can be changed, or maybe a little explanation would do. *Page 34* * 3rd line: "parameters called" => "parameters are called" *Page 36* * second last line: "by a factor of M" => shouldn't it be "by a factor of S"? *Page 40* * Fig 1.20: it would be nice to add M1, M2 and M3 above the corresponding curve *Page 50* * Fig 1.29: in my printing I see "re ect region" (j is missing) *Page 63* * 2nd line above the equation (1.114): f(lamda a + ... => right parenthesis missing
This topic: LCI
>
WebHome
>
540Page
>
CommentsTexbook
>
ChapterOne
Topic revision: r3 - 2005-12-04 - MirelaAndronescu
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback