(r16) InteractionDesignReadingGroup < Imager

Tags: view all tags

---+Interaction Design Reading Group (IDRG)

-- Main.KarynMoffatt - 21 Oct 2005

Paper for 10.26.06

For those of you who will be around next week, we will be read "Touch a Screen or Turn a knob: Choosing the Best Device for the Job" by Wendy A. Rogers, Arthur D. Fisk, Anne Collins Mc Laughlin, and Richard Pak. (Human Factors, 47(2), pp. 271--288).

ABSTRACT

Input devices enable users to interact with systems. In two experiments, we assessed
whether and how task demands and user age influenced task performance for a
direct input device (touch screen) and an indirect input device (rotary encoder). In
Experiment 1, 40 younger (18–28 years) and 40 middle-aged to older adults
(51–65 years) performed tasks using controls such as sliders, up/down buttons,
list boxes, and text boxes while using a system. The optimal input device to facilitate
performance was dependent on the task being performed and the age of the user. In
Experiment 2, touch screen use was assessed for 20 younger (19–23 years) and 20
older adults (51–70 years). Task demands were manipulated through button size,
movement distance, direction, and type of movement. Performance was moderated
by the age of the user and by task demands. Actual or potential applications of this
research include guidance for the optimal selection of input devices for different
user populations and task characteristics.

   * [[%ATTACHURL%/Rogers-Fisk-McLaughlin-Pak-2005J.pdf][Rogers-Fisk-McLaughlin-Pak-2005J.pdf]]: IDRG paper for 10.26.06

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you are working on a paper for CHI 2006 and would like feedback from IDRG members, Please attach your draft to this page.  You can do this by clicking "Attach image or document" in the wiki footer, and following the instructions. PDF format is preferable.

-- Main.KarenParker - 08 Sep 2005

   * [[%ATTACHURL%/email-flow-13.pdf][email-flow-13.pdf]]: Going with the flow: How users continuously manage incoming email
      * Looking for high level comments on: what is obviously missing, or other strange happenings
      * Not too interested in low level nits at this point (unless that's all you've got)

   * [[%ATTACHURL%/Eval_Vis_Adam_Dmitry_0912.pdf][Eval_Vis_Adam_Dmitry_0912.pdf]]: An Evaluation of Overview+Detail and Focus+Context Interfaces with Guaranteed Visibility
      * Mostly complete except results of followup study (in progress) and discussion
      * Looking for high-level suggestions for organization and "spinning" contributions and results

   * [[%ATTACHURL%/epo8.pdf][epo8.pdf]]: Styles of Collaborative Engagement
      * Missing some figures and charts
      * Looking for "obviously missing" things or large organizational issues
      * Aware that it is repetitive and not quite there in terms of tightness

   * [[%ATTACHURL%/epo8.pdf][epo8.pdf]]: Styles of Collaborative Engagement

Attachments

Topic attachments
I	Attachment	History	Action	Size	Date	Who	Comment
pdf	Eval_Vis_Adam_Dmitry_0912.pdf	r2 r1	manage	257.5 K	2005-09-13 - 20:59	UnknownUser
pdf	Rogers-Fisk-Trash.McLaughlin-Pak-2005J.pdf	r1	manage	321.8 K	2005-10-21 - 00:06	KarynMoffatt	IDRG paper for 10.26.06
pdf	email-flow-13.pdf	r1	manage	40.6 K	2005-09-11 - 08:57	TonyTang	Going with the flow: How users continuously manage incoming email
pdf	epo8.pdf	r1	manage	136.2 K	2005-09-12 - 05:53	TonyTang	Styles of Collaborative Engagement

Topic revision: r16 - 2005-10-25 - KarynMoffatt