Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | The following policy was agreed to for allocating the quads for the future. | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > | Desk allocation is maintained by Gregor. Centralizing this makes it possible to do future planning in a way that would not otherwise be possible. | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | FAQ | |||||||
> > | In doing desk allocation, we try to respect the following principles, in roughly this order: | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Shouldn't PhD students have precedence? They're here for longer. | |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | As other students graduate, PhD students will eventually percolate upwards by attrition. During the first year, they're likely taking classes and so it shouldn't matter as much anyways. | |||||||
> > | If you would like to get a new desk assignment please see Gregor. | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Shouldn't we differentiate by whether the new occupants are doing research? The use of seniority essentially provides this. How long is a `short-term use'? Left deliberately vague for flexibility. Generally an office can be found for longer-term visitors. And extremely short-term visitors generally won't need much space anyways. When shouldn't I take a spot? It's expected that people will use some common sense in following this policy: if you're unlikely to be here for much longer, save yourself the hassle of packing and moving and give up your place. | |||||||
> > | -- GregorKiczales - 27 Apr 2006 | |||||||