Difference: MinutesJuly52010 (1 vs. 3)

Revision 32010-07-07 - MatthewBrehmer

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="C-TOC"

C-TOC Meeting Minutes - July 5, 2010

Line: 9 to 9
 

Recent

  • cycle 1 complete, 7 clinical patients, 1 cultural panel focus group
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 

Development

Revision 22010-07-06 - MatthewBrehmer

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="C-TOC"

C-TOC Meeting Minutes - July 5, 2010

Line: 9 to 9
 

Recent

  • cycle 1 complete, 7 clinical patients, 1 cultural panel focus group
Changed:
<
<
  • MB and CJ complete usability evaluations
>
>
 

Development

Line: 31 to 31
 

To do:

  • side projects to validate new test paradigms (neuropsychological studies, involvement of psyc. undergrads) - validation by hand scoring in PPT
Changed:
<
<
  • calibration studies (also involved psyc. undergrads) for pattern construction et al., address baseline configurations of shapes/lines/words in some tests (PC, SqP, SP) - all generative tasks
>
>
  • calibration studies (also involved psyc. undergrads) for pattern construction et al., address baseline configurations of shapes/lines/words in some tests (PC, SqP, SP) - all generative tasks
 
  • validation on language tasks with aphasic patients and controls, again with hand scoring
  • validation/calibration studies will push current prototype to its limits, before any hi-fi dev work, but still focusing on usability
  • address all usability concerns in usability evaluation reports by CJ and MB

Revision 12010-07-06 - MatthewBrehmer

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="C-TOC"

C-TOC Meeting Minutes - July 5, 2010

  • Attendees: Joanna, Claudia, Robin, Steve, Matt

Minutes

Recent

  • cycle 1 complete, 7 clinical patients, 1 cultural panel focus group
  • MB and CJ complete usability evaluations

Development

  • C-TOCv4 for December, validation for CHIR for March?
  • Steve has prototype of video/animated task instructions
  • C-TOCv2 to address usability concerns in usability evaluation reports by CJ and MB, remains in PPT

Test Battery

  • all tests remaining in C-TOCv2, test content generally fine, none discarded
  • media content to be cleared
  • IP violations possible for some test paradigms
  • content approved by B. Purves (speech + audiology sciences), J. Barton (neuroopthamology, spatial perceptual processes, topographical orientation), P. Graf (cog. psychology), H. Feldman
  • C-TOC seen as hybrid between screening and full NP test battery
  • those w/ low computer literacy not to be addressed in first phase
  • presentation of instructions needs to be reviewed, alternatives provided (replay-able video, animations, audio, multimodal options, incremental reveal of text / gradual display of text)
  • How to address timing issue? Who wants to be timed, who does not?

To do:

  • side projects to validate new test paradigms (neuropsychological studies, involvement of psyc. undergrads) - validation by hand scoring in PPT
  • calibration studies (also involved psyc. undergrads) for pattern construction et al., address baseline configurations of shapes/lines/words in some tests (PC, SqP, SP) - all generative tasks
  • validation on language tasks with aphasic patients and controls, again with hand scoring
  • validation/calibration studies will push current prototype to its limits, before any hi-fi dev work, but still focusing on usability
  • address all usability concerns in usability evaluation reports by CJ and MB

-- MatthewBrehmer - 06 Jul 2010

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback