Difference: InterruptionStudy (19 vs. 20)

Revision 202011-02-19 - MatthewBrehmer

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="C-TOC"

Interruption Lab Study

Line: 21 to 21
 
  • 8 trials in SqP, 10 trials in SC, 3 banks of isomorphic trials, which increase in difficulty;
    • difficulty is gauged by number of actions required and complexity of instruction for SC puzzles, gauged by number of lines moved for SqP puzzles;
    • ordering of 3 task banks randomly assigned; subsets of trials in which interruptions occur are semi-randomly generated, with the constraint that interruptions are spread across medium and hard trials; no interruptions occur on easy trials (1st trial in each bank);
Changed:
<
<
    • our dependent measures are speed and accuracy scores from the subset of interruption trials for each participant; dependent measures from other trials are not considered in this analysis
>
>
    • our dependent measures are speed and accuracy scores from the subset of interruption trials for each participant (4 in SC, 3 in SqP); dependent measures from other trials are not considered in this analysis
 
  • for both tasks, interruptions occur on the same subset of trials between interruption conditions;
    • in SC trial banks, interruptions occur after a fixed onset of time as a function of task difficulty;
Line: 29 to 29
 

Planned Analyses

Changed:
<
<
Analysis 1: To determine the local effects of interruption disruption (specific to interrupted trials), we are to conduct a 3 (age, BS) x 3 (interruption demand, WS) mixed-factor ANOVA.
>
>
Analysis 1: To determine the local effects of interruption disruption (specific to interrupted trials), we are to conduct a 3 (age, BS) x 3 (interruption demand, WS) x [3,4] (trial, WS) mixed-factor ANOVA for both SC and SqP. Main effect of trial is not interesting, neither are interactions of trial with age or interruption demand.
 
  • local performance measures - only on subset of trials that are interrupted compared with control condition; remainder of uninterrupted trial scores discarded;
Changed:
<
<
    • 12, 9 data points per participant in SC, SqP
>
>
    • 3 x 4 = 12 data points per participant in SC, 3 x 3 = 9 data points per participant in SqP
 
    • DV1: trial completion time;
    • DV2: trial accuracy score, based on predefined scoring scheme;
Added:
>
>
    • ?DV3: task resumption time vs. avg. interaction interval;?
 
Changed:
<
<
Analysis 2: To determine the global effects of interruption disruption, we are to conduct a 3 (age, BS) x 3 (interruption demand, WS) x 2 (main task, WS) mixed-factor ANOVA.
>
>
Analysis 2: To determine the global effects of interruption disruption, we are to conduct a 3 (age, BS) x 3 (interruption demand, WS) x 2 (main task, WS) mixed-factor ANOVA. Main effect of task is expected, not interesting; interaction effects of task with age, interruption demand are interesting.
 
  • global performance measures, collapsed across all trials in a bank of trials
    • 6 data points per participant (3 from each task)
Changed:
<
<
    • DV1: total completion time for each bank of trials - normalized to compare total completion time between SC and SqP trial banks;
>
>
    • DV1: total completion time for each bank of trials - normalized to compare total completion time between SC and SqP trial banks; (if normally distributed, normalize using z-scores; else, subtract mean from each total completion time)
 
    • DV2: total accuracy score for each bank of trials, score out of 100%;
Added:
>
>
    • ?DV3: avg task resumption time vs. avg. interaction interval;?
  Potential covariates, other recorded DVs:
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback