|
META TOPICPARENT |
name="DuckyHomework" |
Ducky and Sherman's CSCW Project 3
Milestones: |
|
Idea 1: EcoPath |
|
< < | Study academics who are collaborating on building EcoPath models. |
| Pro:
- It could help Sherman with EcoPath
- Sherman might be able to find academics
|
| Con:
- EcoPath is not intrinsicly collaborative
|
|
> > |
Objective 1: See if screen-capture-video of EcoPath sessions is helpful when one researcher asks a non-co-located colleague for help debugging an EcoPath model.
Pro
- Identify screen-capture-video solutions
- Identify modellers at UBC who frequently assist others.
- Ask UBC model-helpers to request screen-capture-videos.
- Observe the resulting debugging sessions.
Objective 2: Observe researchers and see if we can figure out a way to make EcoPath more collaborative.
|
| Idea 2: Distance learning |
|
< < | Study people who are taking distance learning classes |
> > | Study students in different distance learning environments. |
|
Pro: |
|
- need to go off-campus for fieldwork
- need to find participants
|
|
> > |
--+++ Objectives:
- Evaluate how well different tools promote collaboration between students.
- Evaluate how well different tools promote feedback from student to teacher.
|
| Possible participants:
- U Denver
- U Illinois (emailed Burks)
|
|
- snailmail
- posting material for pickup (i.e. Web)
|
|
> > |
First deliverable
Task 1: Project Outline and Research Protocol (due 11/1)
Each team will need to determine and describe in brief the following for a project outline:
- An existing collaborative work group setting (one to which team members do not belong)
- (Optionally) An existing NECTAR or other known CSCW technology
- Research objective(s)
- 3-5 focal points for the fieldwork (class exercise, 10/18)
- Method(s) for data collection (class material, 10/18)
- Research protocol for purposes of ethics approval
- Recruit participants so that field work can begin as soon as ethics approval is received
|