Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ducky Ethics Approval Form Draft NotesDEADLINES for minimal risk studies![]() | ||||||||
Line: 49 to 49 | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Where are the dang forms??? @@@ | |||||||
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | 1. PIMurphy, Gail C. Professor Science/Computer Science N/A N/A N/A +1-604/822-5169 ph +1-604/822-5485 fax murphy at cs.ubc.ca2. minimal risk@@@ Is this minimal risk? The Tri-Council Policy Statement sure seems to imply that, but this is not a questionnaire or use of prior information. Wolfman's paper seems to imply that we are minimal risk.3. fundingNOT funded by for-profit sponsor4. whereUBC (also UVic?)5. titleDeveloper interaction patterns as predictors of code quality @@@ maybe just Finding developer interaction patterns no additional title proposed period: 2007/01/01 to 2007/05/01 @@@?6. requirements@@@ need to know if this is minimal risk or not I need to do a consent form... DuckyEthicsConsentForm see about getting other consent forms from Gail7. Signaturesneed Gail and Bill8. ContactI assume Gail is the contact, see info from 1. address: 201-2366 Main Mall, V6T 1Z49. Co-investigatorSHERWOOD Kaitlin Duck Graduate Science @@@?/CPSC N/A Vancouver N/A N/A9c qualificationsThe principal investigator (Gail Murphy) and co-investigator (Kaitlin Sherwood) will conduct the studies. Dr. Murphy totally rocks@@@. Ms. Sherwood is currently a graduate student at UBC and has been a teaching assistant for two upper-division Human-Computer Interaction classes (CPSC 344 and 444), both of which include instruction on both human subjects procedures and experimental procedures. (@@@More?@@@: She has approximately fifteen years of industrial experience and has authors two books.)9d TCPS tutorialyep10 Funding source@@@ not sure11 peer reviewno? supposed to get committee approval?12 other institutions@@@ don't know | |||||||
13. Summary of research | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | BackgroundIntegrated Development Environments (IDEs) are the principal tools used by computer scientists to write and/or modify software. | |||||||
Purpose and objective | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | We hope to learn to recognize specific techniques that software developers use that correlate with the quality of the code that they generate. | |||||||
Hypothesis | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Hypothesis: when developers interact with IDEs, there are usage patterns whose appearance or frequency correlate with the skill of the programmer as measured by the quality of their code submissions. | |||||||
JustificationMethodAnalysis | ||||||||
Line: 92 to 164 | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
<--
|