Difference: DuckyEthicsDraft (4 vs. 5)

Revision 52006-11-07 - DuckySherwood

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="DuckyHomework"

Ducky Ethics Approval Form Draft Notes

DEADLINES for minimal risk studies - Nov 10, Dec 1, Dec 21
Line: 49 to 49
 
  • Advertisement to recruit students?
  • Subject consent form
  • Fee for service form?
Added:
>
>
Where are the dang forms??? @@@
 
Added:
>
>

1. PI

Murphy, Gail C. Professor Science/Computer Science N/A N/A N/A +1-604/822-5169 ph +1-604/822-5485 fax murphy at cs.ubc.ca

2. minimal risk

@@@ Is this minimal risk? The Tri-Council Policy Statement sure seems to imply that, but this is not a questionnaire or use of prior information. Wolfman's paper seems to imply that we are minimal risk.

3. funding

NOT funded by for-profit sponsor

4. where

UBC (also UVic?)

5. title

Developer interaction patterns as predictors of code quality @@@ maybe just Finding developer interaction patterns

no additional title proposed period: 2007/01/01 to 2007/05/01 @@@?

6. requirements

@@@ need to know if this is minimal risk or not

I need to do a consent form... DuckyEthicsConsentForm see about getting other consent forms from Gail

7. Signatures

need Gail and Bill

8. Contact

I assume Gail is the contact, see info from 1. address: 201-2366 Main Mall, V6T 1Z4

9. Co-investigator

SHERWOOD Kaitlin Duck Graduate Science @@@?/CPSC N/A Vancouver N/A N/A

9c qualifications

The principal investigator (Gail Murphy) and co-investigator (Kaitlin Sherwood) will conduct the studies. Dr. Murphy totally rocks@@@. Ms. Sherwood is currently a graduate student at UBC and has been a teaching assistant for two upper-division Human-Computer Interaction classes (CPSC 344 and 444), both of which include instruction on both human subjects procedures and experimental procedures. (@@@More?@@@: She has approximately fifteen years of industrial experience and has authors two books.)

9d TCPS tutorial

yep

10 Funding source

@@@ not sure

11 peer review

no? supposed to get committee approval?

12 other institutions

@@@ don't know
 

13. Summary of research

Added:
>
>

Background

Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) are the principal tools used by computer scientists to write and/or modify software.
 

Purpose and objective

Added:
>
>
We hope to learn to recognize specific techniques that software developers use that correlate with the quality of the code that they generate.
 

Hypothesis

Added:
>
>
Hypothesis: when developers interact with IDEs, there are usage patterns whose appearance or frequency correlate with the skill of the programmer as measured by the quality of their code submissions.
 

Justification

Method

Analysis

Line: 92 to 164
 

Added:
>
>
<--   
-->
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback