Difference: TenureAndPromotion (3 vs. 4)

Revision 42008-08-27 - KevinLeytonBrown

Line: 1 to 1

META TOPICPARENT	name="WebHome"

Tenure and Promotion Information

Line: 36 to 36

A brief statement describing the publication forums and their quality should be given at the beginning of the publication record. This is also a good place for any notes regarding conventions on the order of authorship; as per the "Guide to Promotion and Tenure Procedures", Section 2.3.8, it is recommended to include such notes.

Changed:

<
<

Sections 2.3.8-10 of the "Guide to Promotion and Tenure Procedures" contain information on how the entries of the Publication Record should be structured and marked up.

>
>

Sections 2.3.8-10 of the "Guide to Promotion and Tenure Procedures" contain information on how the entries of the Publication Record should be structured and marked up. These sections are excerpted below for convenience.

As per the templates listed above, the publication record no longer includes a table with summary statistics from the various sections.

(Anyone who has additional generic information, e.g., from feedback they received during their P&T process, should add this here.)

Added:

>
>

Sections 2.3.8-10 of the "Guide to Promotion and Tenure Procedures"

2.3.8

Publications should be listed in the standard bibliographical form (with first and last page indicated and the order of authorship clear). Conventions on the order of authorship vary widely and it is helpful to SAC to be informed of the convention in use. Those publications that the candidate considers to be of primary importance are to be marked with an asterisk. The candidate's work in refereed publications should be identified with an “R” in the left-hand margin beside the bibliographical entry, or through a separate listing.

2.3.9

Where there is multiple authorship of papers or books, it would be helpful to make the precise role of the candidate clear. The candidate might include a statement of "policy on authorship" in the CV that indicates the significance of first author, last author, etc., or might specify the contribution made to each publication. Alternatively, the head’s letter might contain this information.

2.3.10

For co-authored papers, it is helpful to have a code that indicates the status and role of other authors, e.g., which co-authors are a candidate’s own former supervisors or current or former graduate students or postdoctoral fellows.

Long Confusing Documents:

The official university guidelines can be found at http://www.facultyassociation.ubc.ca/agreements/ca4.htm

View topic | History: r14 < r13 < r12 < r11 | More topic actions...