Course Description:
CS 100: Introduction to Computing through Applications
Using personal computers as effective problem solving tools for the present and the future. Effective use of spreadsheets to process, manipulate, and visualize numeric and textual information. Introduction to the Internet, World Wide Web, HTML, and XML. Algorithms underlying the functional components of web search engines and their influence on data access. Using wikis to publish, reshape, and organize data collaboratively.
Dave's Comments:
This was the first time I was the "instructor" for CS 100, although I use that term very loosely as I did no instruction. My only concrete contributions were related to assignments and exams.

As a result, these evaluations are really more of an evaluation of the course, and not me.

I did not change any content for the course. I was mostly auditing the course to see how it was working (or not working). I was researching and developing new material. I conducted a large survey at the end of course to assess student opinions on individual modules (e.g., which modules were more "useful" or "interesting").

I was working remotely throughout the term, and was relying heavily on the ISAs (coop students) and the ISG Coordinator (Barbara) to keep the course running smoothly.
Teaching Evaluations:
Number of Respondents: 70 / 362 (19%)
Responses:
Course materials were presented in an organised manner.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
15381142
21%54%16%6%3%
Expectations for learning were clearly communicated.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
7381762
10%54%24%9%3%
The assignments, activities, and content helped me achieve the stated learning objectives.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
10431061
14%61%14%9%1%
The assignments contributed to my learning.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
2137741
30%53%10%6%1%
Feedback on course assignments contributed to my learning.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
32327116
4%33%39%16%9%
Technology was used effectively for learning in the course.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
1836952
26%51%13%7%3%
The general climate in the course was good for learning.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
8322433
11%46%34%4%4%
The instructor related to students in a way that promoted mutual respect.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
3342921
4%49%42%3%1%
The instructor's explanations were clear and understandable.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
33220122
4%46%29%17%3%
The instructor was helpful to students seeking assistance.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
8352411
12%51%35%1%1%
Overall, I learned a great deal from this course.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
9411154
13%59%16%7%6%
Overall, I learned a great deal from the instructor.
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree
4193556
6%28%51%7%9%
This course is:
requiredelective
1456
20%80%
On average, I spent x hours per week working on this course.
Significantly less than 10 hoursLess than 10 hoursAround 10 hoursMore than 10 hoursSignificantly more than 10 hours
12332032
17%47%29%4%3%
Comments:
Note: This is a complete list of comments I received, listed alphabetically to avoid bias.
What grade do you expect in this course? (percentage 1%...100%)
In your opinion the strengths of this course are:
In your opinion the weaknesses of this course are:
The instructor would like to know what specific things you believe might be done to improve the teaching of this course:
All of the data for this page is available in the github repository: https://github.com/dtompkins/teacheval